Exporting Exploitation: The Ugly Truth About Outsourcing to the Philippines

Outsourcing isn’t job creation. It’s wage theft with a passport - even when Filipinos do it to Filipinos.

Written By Clifford Temprosa

For decades, outsourcing to the Philippines has been sold as progress. Government officials boast of billions in BPO revenue. Corporations praise “efficiency.” Even members of the diaspora congratulate themselves for “helping the homeland” when they hire workers for a fraction of U.S. wages.

But behind the glow of GDP statistics and press releases lies a harder truth: outsourcing isn’t empowerment. It’s exploitation digitized. It is the rebranding of a centuries-old story: Filipino labor sold cheap, profit siphoned abroad, dignity dismissed as a luxury. The tragedy is not only that this model continues, but that we’ve convinced ourselves to celebrate it as success.

Workers on the Edge

At 3 a.m. in Ortigas, a young mother sits in a brightly lit pantry, slurping instant noodles during her “lunch break.” Her toddler sleeps at home with grandparents. For her ten-hour shift answering irate customer calls from Ohio, she earns $600 a month, enough to keep the lights on, but not enough for her father’s dialysis.

In Arizona, her American counterpart earns more than $4,000 for the same work, plus health insurance, labor protections, and the dignity of sleeping at night. The gap is not skill. It is geography turned into economic weaponry.

And then there’s the Filipino American entrepreneur in New Jersey who insists he is “supporting the motherland” by hiring a virtual assistant in Cebu for $3 an hour. The VA works U.S. hours, mirrors U.S. productivity, and adapts to U.S. expectations. What the entrepreneur calls empowerment is, in truth, survival on scraps.

Outsourcing isn’t generosity. It is the systematic transfer of wealth from the poor to the powerful, dressed up as opportunity.

A History of Extraction

The Philippines has always been cast as a labor colony. Under Spain, Filipinos manned galleons and tilled haciendas. Under America, the islands became a military outpost, and Filipinos were exported as nurses, teachers, and farmhands.

Today’s outsourcing is only the newest chapter. The galleon trade has become fiber-optic trade. Plantation hierarchies have become call center hierarchies. Exploitation hasn’t disappeared. It has simply been digitized.

What was once done with ships and bases is now done with headsets and laptops.

The Mirage of Progress

Outsourcing is hailed as “uplift.” But uplift for whom?

Across Manila, Cebu, Bacolod, Iloilo, and Davao, call centers employ hundreds of thousands. But what counts as “good pay” in these cities still means cramped apartments, crowded jeepney commutes, and families one medical bill away from collapse.

Governments tout rising GDP and billions in BPO revenue, but these numbers mask inequality. Profits concentrate in a handful of conglomerates. Workers remain precarious, living fragile lives beneath glowing economic headlines.

The GDP looks good. The people don’t.

The Human Cost: Bodies and Futures

Outsourcing exploits not only wallets, but bodies. Graveyard shifts colonize time itself: lunch at 2 a.m., commuting home at dawn, collapsing into bed while the world outside wakes. This “body clock colonization” shortens lifespans, heightens cancer and depression risks, and destabilizes families. Parents miss mornings, children adapt to absence, marriages strain under exhaustion.

The burden falls disproportionately on women. BPOs and virtual assistant industries hire Filipinas in droves, repeating the old story of feminized Filipino labor: domestic helpers in Hong Kong, nurses in London, now call center agents in Ortigas. Exploitation leans on their resilience, squeezing both labor and love out of their bodies.

Meanwhile, outsourcing siphons talent from industries that could transform the Philippines. Engineers and nurses trade professions for call center paychecks. Every engineer answering phones in Cebu is an engineer not building bridges. Every nurse logging insurance claims for a U.S. hospital is a nurse missing from a Philippine ward. This brain drain stalls innovation and keeps the nation dependent.

Outsourcing is not just work. It is structural violence - against health, against gender equity, against the possibility of a future.

Governments, Corporations, and Middlemen

Why do governments embrace outsourcing so fervently? Because it gives them cover. Outsourcing is a narcotic: it numbs the pain of poverty while ensuring the wound never heals. Instead of investing in agriculture, manufacturing, or local technology, leaders can point to BPO billions as proof of progress. Why reform healthcare or labor protections when outsourcing props up GDP?

Corporations benefit, too. Instead of nurturing Filipino industries, conglomerates play landlord to foreign firms. The state and elites outsource their own responsibility, reducing Filipinos to a

rented labor force. And exploitation always finds middlemen. Where friars and governors once mediated colonial power, today oligarchs and even diaspora entrepreneurs act as brokers - delivering cheap labor and cultural fluency while profits flow abroad.

Exploitation adapts. Its face changes. Its structure endures.

Global Race, Local Silence

The Philippines is not alone. India, Vietnam, and other nations are locked in a global race to the bottom, each outbidding the other by offering cheaper labor, fewer protections, and weaker regulations. For corporations, this is efficiency. For workers, it is a trap disguised as opportunity.

This race strips nations of agency. Countries compete not by asking how we can empower our people? but by asking how cheaply can we sell them? Every new contract signed abroad is celebrated at home, even as it pushes the bar for dignity lower and lower.

Why do foreign firms find the Philippines especially appealing? Because the system is designed to favor them. Labor rights are weak. Unions are discouraged or broken. Collective bargaining is punished. Contracts are short, benefits thin, job security nonexistent. In the U.S., workers can strike for better pay. In Manila, Cebu, or Bacolod, workers are reminded that they are replaceable.

Exploitation is not an accident. It is engineered - through laws written to attract foreign investors, through silence enforced by fear of termination, through a culture of endurance that mistakes survival for success.

The Diaspora Double Standard

Filipino Americans march for racial justice in Chicago, fight wage theft in Los Angeles, and demand equity in New York. They understand injustice when it happens to them. But too many of those same voices underpay workers in Cebu or Davao, justifying it as “supporting the homeland.”

This is the hypocrisy that stings most: fighting exploitation abroad while perpetuating it at home. Diaspora entrepreneurs wrap themselves in pride when they hire virtual assistants for $3 an hour, calling it empowerment. In reality, they are reproducing the same power dynamics they claim to resist - using difference in geography as an alibi for wage theft.

Solidarity cannot stop at the Pacific Ocean. Justice cannot be demanded in America and denied in the Philippines.

Filipino Americans aren’t exempt. When we underpay our own, we become the colonizers we claim to resist.

When the Clock Runs Out

Outsourcing is not just exploitative - it is unsustainable. With AI advancing rapidly, millions of jobs in transcription, customer service, and back-office support are poised to vanish. The very industries that sustain Cebu, Iloilo, Bacolod, and Davao could collapse in a matter of years.

What happens when chatbots replace agents? When do contracts shift to Vietnam or Africa? What happens when multinational corporations realize they can automate loyalty itself?

A nation built on rented labor is a nation built on sand. The Philippines faces a stark choice: reinvent or collapse. Will it diversify its industries, invest in domestic innovation, and build sovereignty? Or will it sink deeper into dependency, clinging to the false comfort of jobs that no longer exist?

Outsourcing is not development. It is a countdown. The question is not if, but when the clock runs out.

Choosing Economic Sovereignty

If we claim to love the Philippines, we must refuse to accept exploitation as empowerment.

That means:

● Pay fair wages, not just “good by Philippine standards.” Fairness is not relative - it is universal.

● Protect labor rights and allow unionization. Dignity cannot exist without the freedom to organize.

● Pressure governments to invest in industries Filipinos can truly own, from agriculture to technology. Dependency is not sovereignty.

● Demand dignity across borders, whether the boss is American, European, or Filipino American. Solidarity must mean the same thing in Manila as it does in New York.

● Reject dependency disguised as development. GDP gains mean nothing if families remain fragile.

What’s ‘livable’ in Manila is poverty in New York. That’s not empowerment - it’s exploitation. Outsourcing isn’t job creation. It’s wage theft with a passport.

The true measure of solidarity is not how many jobs we create but whether those jobs allow people to live whole, dignified lives. Outsourcing will continue to expand. The question is whether it will enslave, or empower. The choice is not in the hands of corporations. It is in ours.

---

Written By Clifford Temprosa

---